Print This Article Post Comment Add To Favorites Email to Friends Ezine Ready

Affirmative Action Compliance In Higher Education

By: Lawrence Martin Home | Reference-and-Education


Affirmative action is a government policy that seeks to remedy long-standing discrimination directed at specific groups, including women and racial and ethnic minorities. The basic purpose of affirmative action policies and programs is to increase access to, and ensure the equitable distribution of, opportunities in higher education, employment, government contracts, housing, and other social-welfare areas. To this end, affirmative action provides regulations, procedures, and guidelines to assure that eligible and interested citizens receive equal consideration regardless of their race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or age. Affirmative action does not fully restrict all forms of discrimination or make them illegal. Rather, it attempts to redress historical inequities by providing traditionally underrepresented groups with more equal access to most public and private arenas. This access is regarded as "more equal" since it attempts to address years of inequities and inequalities within a short amount of time.
The civil rights innovations outlined in the U.S. Constitution were not available to all of the inhabitants of the new nation. Prior to 1865, most African Americans were slaves, and they were considered property and counted for census purposes as three-fifths of a person. For the most part, Native Americans received no consideration at all. Women, although counted as full persons in census data, had very few rights. In spite of a variety of legal and social changes, these groups continued to suffer blatant discrimination well into the second half of the twentieth century.
The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution provides the legal basis for affirmative action policies. Added to the Constitution in 1868, this amendment extends legal protection to all U.S. citizens. Specifically, the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment asserts that, "No state shall †deny to any person within its jurisdiction, the equal protection of laws." Although the language is clear, this legislation was infrequently enforced.
It was not until the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Brown v. Board of Education (1954) that the notion of equal protection received serious national consideration. Specifically citing the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court held that racial segregation in elementary and
secondary education is unconstitutional because it promotes an unequal educational system. Following this ruling, President John F. Kennedy issued Executive Order 10925 in 1961, which asked federal contractors to adopt diversity programs in an effort to help end segregation. (This order provides the legal foundation for affirmative action programs.)
In the spirit of the equal protection clause, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bans discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. To ensure compliance, federal funds are denied to those institutions that violate this mandate. More specifically, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 states that:
It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer (1) to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; or (2) to limit, segregate, or classify his employees or applicants for employment in any way which would deprive or tend to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect his status as an employee, because of such individual's race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Compliance
To ensure compliance, the federal government established the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Established in 1965 under Executive Order 11246, the OFCCP reviews, monitors, and enforces an institution's affirmative action plan. The OFCCP posits that each employment agency is responsible for designing an "acceptable" affirmative action program, which "must include an analysis of areas within which the contractor is deficient in the utilization of minority groups †and further, goals and timetables to which the contractor's good faith efforts must be directed to correct the deficiencies, and thus to achieve prompt and full utilization of minorities †at all levels and in all segments of its work force where deficiencies exist" (41 C.F.R. Sec. 60-2.10).
Similar to the OFCCP, the EEOC also helps to enforce antidiscrimination laws and regulations. Created by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC also enforces other related legislation, including the Equal Pay Act of 1963, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. The EEOC investigates discrimination charges filed by individuals. If an employer is in violation, the EEOC first attempts to bring about voluntary resolution. If this fails, the EEOC may choose to file suit against the employer in federal court. At the conclusion of such a case, the EEOC issues a "notice of the right to sue," which allows an individual to file an additional suit in federal court.
To comply with affirmative action regulations, most colleges and universities reformed their admissions and hiring practices. Throughout the 1970s, higher education institutions established affirmative action programs and antidiscrimination policies designed to increase the number of women and minority students and faculty members in all fields and disciplines. These activities included actively encour-aging women and minorities to apply for faculty and administrative positions, aggressively recruiting students from traditionally underrepresented groups, and offering support programs to help at-risk students succeed. Even so, affirmative action programs did not resolve all of the discrimination problems affecting higher education. Instead, it became one of them. In fact, white women received the greatest benefit from these programs, and many people questioned the constitutionality of affirmative action.



Article Source: http://www.eArticlesOnline.com

About the Author:
writing prices

Tags: ,

Please Rate this Article

 

Not yet Rated

Click the XML Icon Above to Receive Reference-and-Education Articles Via RSS!

Recent Related Articles From Reference-and-Education

  • Pennsylvania Civil Rights Violations In Luzerne County: Judges Plead Guilty
    By: Stuart Carpey | May 2nd 2009
    The hallmark of America's civil rights is the protection from the State intruding upon its citizens. Individuals whose rights are violated have avenues that can be pursued. Read

  • Civil Rights In A Fledging Democracy
    By: calevmyers | Oct 29th 2010
    Calev Myers works for civil rights and freedom of religion in Israel and provides legal defense for minority religious groups and has spoken out on many fundamental rights issues including equal access to education, humanitarian needs, social justice & civil rights. Read

  • Civil Rights And African-american
    By: Andrew Collins | May 11th 2010
    Unemployment is one of the main issues which have worked against the civil rights and identity, livelihood of African Americans. Read

  • Jackie Robinson-a Civil Rights Hero
    By: bill bathe | Jul 26th 2006
    Jackie Robinson transcended the color barrier in major league baseball and became a hero for humanity. He was an icon for civil rights and helped lead the way for other ballplayers. A true inspiration to us all. An example of bravery and courage. Baseball was simply a vehicle for Jackie Robinson to Read

  • Civil Rights Movements
    By: Stephen Howard | Apr 6th 2010
    Those who have been discriminated against know the importance of civil rights equality and how unbalanced these rights are dispersed. Read

  • Chicago Civil Rights Attorney
    By: Linnit Paulic | Jun 3rd 2010
    the article deals with Chicago civil rights attorney and tells us about the long process of finding and choosing him considering all the circumstances of every particular case. The following material would be useful for all interested in the following question Read

  • Inmate Suffered Brain Injuries, Sheriff Testifies
    By: William Lenovo | Jun 4th 2009
    A former sheriff is being named in a civil rights lawsuit filed by the family of an inmate who suffered brain injuries. The trial is schedule for August. If you are in need of a personal injury lawyer, contact the Killino Firm. Read

  • How To Write Affirmative Action Essay Without Social Discrimination
    By: Warren Osborne | Sep 2nd 2010
    Affirmative actions are all those actions which are taken for the welfare of the society considering many issues, like racial discrimination, social issues, ethnicity problems etc. and essay written on such topic is called as affirmative action essay. Read

  • Equal Pay Today - Tomorrow The White House
    By: Patricia L Johnson | Sep 5th 2007
    They're everywhere - you see them on the roads holding signs for the Dept. of Transportation, reading your gas meter, installing telephone lines, delivering your UPS packages, and even going to war in Afghanistan and Iraq, but what has not changed - based on current statistics, is the disparity in salaries between men and w ... Read

  • Protecting Whistleblowers' Rights
    By: Peter Kent | Feb 24th 2008
    The whistleblowers of America are widely protected by many laws and are highly relied upon to bring injustices to the attention of lawkeepers. While many individuals who witness fraud or occupational concerns fear backlash from an employer or employees, each individual should understand and know that the law is on their sid ... Read


Copyright © 2005-2011 eArticlesOnline, LLC - All Rights Reserved
Terms of Service | Privacy Policy